What is the major downside of using CO2 gas with GMAW?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Study for the First Year Welding Test. Enhance your skills with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each with tips and detailed explanations. Prepare for success!

Using carbon dioxide (CO2) gas with Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) can indeed lead to excessive spatter, which is a significant downside. CO2, while being cost-effective and providing good penetration, tends to produce an unstable arc when compared to other shielding gases such as argon or argon mixtures. This instability is associated with more erratic molten metal transfer modes, resulting in increased splatter during the welding process. Excessive spatter not only creates a messy workspace but may also require additional cleanup and can compromise the overall quality of the weld, as it may form weld defects.

In contrast, other factors like weld strength or cost do not primarily hinge on the use of CO2. While spatter can directly impact the quality and appearance of the weld, and potentially lead to rework, the weld strength achieved with CO2 can still be adequate for many applications. Additionally, CO2 is a relatively inexpensive shielding gas, so the issue of increased cost doesn't apply here. Lastly, while reduced arc stability does seem relevant, the more pronounced consequence observed with CO2 is the excessive spatter resulting from the nature of metal transfer in the arc.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy